This Will Be Worse Than Pearl Harbor...

Prepper.
Bolt your doors... lock your windows... and Watch This Mind-Blowing Video TODAY... mind blowing video



Because it reveals The #1 Reason CIA Director James Woolsey claims
over 228 million
Americans could be dead by election day...

And it won't be China, Russia, or ISIS pulling the trigger.

In fact, it's much closer to home....

It's already been banned in several key liberal states...

But word's spread fast...

Over 18,453,961 Americans have already seen it...

Click HERE Now to See the Full Shocking Documentary
(It only takes 3 minutes)

But Act Now - Before it's too late.

At the time, the use of such robust force against Katanga, including aircraft, artillery, and armoured vehicles, aroused much controversy.[83] Though personally dismayed by the violence as a Buddhist, Thant thought the operation was justified.[75] His reasoning for such strong action fell in line with just war theory.[83] Proponents of Katanga argued that the secessionist movement was a legitimate exercise of self-determination. Thant refuted the idea in his memoirs, listing three primary objections: first, the Congo had been admitted into the UN in 1960 as a "unified state" with the written agreement of Tshombe. Second, "no sovereign state in the world ever recognised the independence of Katanga". Third, Tshombe's government was "never able to exercise effective control" over the entirety of the province.[83] Military researcher Walter Dorn speculated that Thant may have been personally sensitive to the issue of secession, having suffered from the bloody Karen conflict in his native Burma and witnessed the consequences of the Partition of India.[86] Holding office during a time of widespread decolonisation in Africa and Asia, Thant was mindful of the precedent he was setting; recognising or encouraging secession in one country could allow it to spread to others with fractious consequences. As late as February 1970, he denounced secession, declaring that the UN "has never accepted and does not accept, and I do not believe it will ever accept, the principle of secession of a part of its Member State."[45] Thant also argued that ONUC had the enumerated authority to use force, as specified in the UN Charter and permitted by the UN Security Council in its resolutions. He maintained that Grandslam was a matter of last resort, as Tshombe had frequently gone back on his promises and decisive action was only taken after sustained Katangese aggression against UN peacekeepers.[45] Thant claimed that ONUC had used force "in self-defence under attack", though this was not strictly the case, as he had, in accordance with the Security Council resolutions, authorised UN troops to undertak